Maybe we should have taken care of Japan properly in 1945

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16
Tokens
I mean, I just don't see any Japanese troops fighting the terrorists in Iraq. Where are they? We saved them after WWII and this is how they repay us?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16
Tokens
Really, and after all we did for them after 1945.....helping to rebuild their country, their economy, and they can't even help us out now.....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
posted vy Vinny_LC:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
I mean, I just don't see any Japanese troops fighting the terrorists in Iraq. Where are they? We saved them after WWII and this is how they repay us? ... Really, and after all we did for them after 1945.....helping to rebuild their country, their economy, and they can't even help us out now.....
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

What about all we did for them before 1945? It's amazing that the Japanese have anything to do with us at all given that the only example of the absolutely most destructive man-made force ever devised was used by us, against them. And to say that we played any substantial part in rebuilding their country, especially with the implication that they could not have done as much or better without or "help," is simple bromide (see also "Slaves to the Marshall Myth.")

And why the Japanese in particular? There are all kinds of countries that aren't "on board" with the traitor Bush's plan for fighting terrorism.

And just what do you mean by "we should have taken care of them properly?" We should have nuked them more? Made them a colony? ________?


Phaedrus
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,241
Messages
13,565,830
Members
100,771
Latest member
Bronco87
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com